Likud

Likud voted against a bill to establish a state commission of inquiry and advanced an alternative in which the appointment mechanism is not controlled by the President of the Supreme Court. The party line therefore rejects the precise appointment mechanism in the statement.

Senior Likud figures advanced the Levin–Sa’ar framework, which would bar review of Basic Laws and restrict the invalidation of ordinary laws. The Likud-led government also enacted the curtailment of the reasonableness standard and announced in July 2026 that it would not comply with a ruling concerning the media regulator.

Likud opposed limiting a prime minister’s tenure, arguing that in a parliamentary democracy the decision should remain with the public.

The Netanyahu government continued to advance earmarked coalition allocations in 2026. Even after the election recess began, the Finance Committee, chaired by a Likud MK, considered additional transfers for sector-specific purposes. This record directly conflicts with abolishing the allocations across the board and moving them into ordinary ministry budgets.

Likud members, including those who joined it through the merger, voted for the law allowing the government to depart from the Attorney General’s legal opinion. The vote directly covers the current party.

Netanyahu presented a civilian administration that would be run by neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority, as part of an international plan. This is an explicit position by the Likud chair on the subject of the statement.

Netanyahu stated that Israel would retain security responsibility and a security perimeter around Gaza for the foreseeable future, while the same plan defined an alternative civilian administration. This directly covers the security-control component after civilian government is established.

Netanyahu pledged that there would be no Palestinian state west of the Jordan River. This is an explicit and current position by the Likud chair against the diplomatic horizon described in the statement.

In a direct survey, Likud answered that it would vote for a law applying sovereignty in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank). The commitment is broader still than applying sovereignty to Area C.

No current official Likud position was found on opening every combat and command role to women under uniform professional criteria. Statements by individual members do not add up to a party line.

Likud's current line is against the statement: Netanyahu, the party chair and prime minister, rejected renewed civilian settlement in Gaza and did not make it a government objective. Visible internal dissent remains because Likud ministers and MKs also joined a July 2026 march calling for settlements in the Strip. The party leadership is against the statement, while the internal disagreement is shown beside that position.

Likud members, together with those who joined it in the merger, voted for the law on its third reading. The law does exactly what the statement describes.

The coalition policy led by Likud does not impose universal mandatory military or civilian service with only narrow exemptions.

Likud's current line falls between the endpoints: the coalition-backed arrangement contains some personal and financial sanctions, but they are limited or conditional, while most Likud MKs also supported freezing arrests of people liable for enlistment. Yuli Edelstein, Dan Illouz and Sharren Haskel opposed the freeze. Because the statement requires significant sanctions, the mixed policy is neither clear support nor clear opposition. The dissenting votes show a genuine internal disagreement.

Likud's current position is against civil marriage: the faction majority and the coalition commitment preserved the religious status quo. Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana voted for a civil-marriage bill and Dan Illouz defended the national-liberal line, so the internal disagreement is shown alongside the clear majority position.

All 29 Likud members and the three members of the United Right voted for the law permitting such arbitration with the parties’ consent.

The Likud-led government decided in November 2025 to oppose a bill empowering local authorities to operate public transport on Shabbat.

The Likud-led government approved funding for Shas’s education network without requiring a core curriculum, directly contrary to the condition in the statement. This is an act of the government and coalition, not a provision in a new election platform.

Likud opposed advancing a Basic Law that would expressly enshrine equality and prohibit discrimination.

Likud rejected a coalition partnership with Arab parties. This is the current public line of the merged party.

No current Likud line was found that resolves whether to increase the tax burden specifically on high earners in order to expand social services.

In 2026, Economy Minister Nir Barkat sought to add matzah to the basket of price-controlled goods after unusually high profitability was found. This is a current, targeted action, but not a provision in the party platform.

The Likud-led government opened quotas and reduced tariffs in some food sectors, while also making food security and strengthening domestic production a policy objective. This is a conditional position that does not accept across-the-board harm to farmers as the price of the policy.

The roll call establishes a clear current line against the statement: a large majority of Likud members and members who later joined it supported the mother-only employment test. Dan Illouz voted against, so the dissent remains visible without cancelling the majority outcome.

The current position is against the statement based on the direct roll-call majority: eight Likud members opposed raising the exemption threshold and four supported it. The minority support is shown as internal debate, but it does not turn an 8–4 vote into missing data.

Defense Minister Israel Katz ended the use of administrative detention against Jews, and clarified in July 2026 that the policy remained in force, even while leaving open the exceptional use of other administrative tools. The statement is limited to administrative detention, so the position here is direct and clear.

Likud supported the restrictive temporary provision and its subsequent strengthening, rather than moving to individual assessment of every application.

Likud's current line is against the statement: most of the faction and coalition defeated the January 2026 bill to prohibit conversion therapy for minors. Amir Ohana voted for the bill, so internal dissent is displayed alongside the majority outcome.

The Likud-led government shifted the center of gravity to assistance from the Shin Bet, police, and emergency measures, and also diverted civilian budgets. Its activity nevertheless includes some civilian components.

Likud committed to abolishing the congestion charge, and Transportation Minister Miri Regev reiterated her opposition to implementing it even as implementation continued.